In this Octobereview, I wrap up the Discworld Roleplaying Game (powered by GURPS), by Terry Pratchett and Phil Masters. Last time, I talked about the setting chapters.
This
time, I'm reviewing the remaining parts of the book (pp 367–408), all the
juicy running-the-game stuff!
This is probably the most important section to me. Although the 'GURPS rules' parts are necessary for running the game, and the 'Discworld review' parts are necessary for understanding the canon world, this is where the authors are handed the reins to really extrapolate, develop, and get creative.
Part 11: Bad food, no sleep, and strange people
We start the section with Running for your laugh, guidance for game/campaign management. There's some good general structural advice here. They also managed to get a chuckle out of me (p 368):
If anyone really wanted, they could use the setting for an
old-fashioned game in which heroes and wizards beat up monsters and take
their treasure. Or they could create gloomy sagas about angst-ridden
vampires on the streets of Ankh-Morpork. There's no obvious reason to do
so, but nothing to stop anyone, either.
The authors talk about managing tempo and pace (p
369). This advice is generally good, but some lines jumped out to me here: "a fight that lasts mere seconds
in the game world can take much of the session to run [...] The GM
should avoid combat if the current aim of the game is to get to the next important plot point quickly." Emphasis in original.
I must admit, this – and some similar language scattered throughout the book – rubbed me the wrong way. It practically admits that the underlying engine is too slow to be useful. It also suggests a view of the GM as fundamentally a linear storyteller, which might be appropriate if this was, you know, a story-telling game, rather than a traditional TTRPG with a smattering of story-telling elements.* Pesto and chocolate milk are both tasty, and maybe you could find a recipe to combine them complementarily, but it's been 368 pages of rules for chocolate milk and now I'm being told to sprinkle pesto on top.
* The implication, here and elsewhere, is that the GM's role is to decide "the next important plot point", disregarding choices and rules to shepherd the player (character)s towards it. I'm not a fan.
The text goes on to add, "In general, Discworld games should run fast and light. [...] A roleplaying game, humorous or not,
is a cooperative project, and if the GM takes too much power from the
players, they'll ultimately become frustrated. Everyone should be
allowed input." Again, this sentiment seems out of place for a simulation-heavy TTRPG
"Everyone should be allowed input" ...into what, exactly? This pretty clearly doesn't just mean the truism, "don't take away for non-diegetic reasons the exactly one way players can affect their environment in a classic TTRPG, i.e., their power to make their characters'
decisions".
Even with a generous reading it seems to mean, "import story-telling-game elements into how you run this TTRPG, by having aspects of the world/outcomes decided by an unspecified collaborative process with the players." And in 408 pages there are no rules for doing that, and little to no advice for dealing with the dissonance of players having to break out of the making-decisions-as-if-they-were-their-character headspace to make decisions about the world as if they were its creator. Shrug.
One little thing that caught my attention, on p 371, is that "The Colour of Magic
contains several RPG references". This surprised me; maybe I need to read it again.* It definitely contains a lot of references
to the sort of 1960s-70s pulp adventure and sci-fi/fantasy fiction on which early
D&D was built, but if there are direct TTRPG aspects, I never noticed them.
*
The game the gods play throughout has miniature tokens
representing characters and creatures, but I remember it being in much more of a "European
boardgame" style.
Sample campaign setting
The book's main sample setting (essentially, pirate adventure in the Brown Islands*) is quite good! It covers a region that sits largely outside of the Discworld canon, and it hits a lot of the right notes in terms of descriptiveness and usefulness to a GM. The islands are presented as a sort of semi-policed melting-pot wilderness borderlands, which is an excellent background for RPG adventure.
* A pastiche of Hawaii, mostly.
I'm pretty sure that Llapffargoch-Wokkaiiooii is meant to extend the Hawaiian pastiche to include some of the Pacific Islands and New Zealand, which (as a New Zealander) feels a bit forced, but that's pretty much always going to be the case when you're reading an outsider's view.
I've got to say, the
idea of hiring the PCs to "break into an enemy's home or workplace and
rearrange the furniture to bring bad luck" is great. That's completely outside of the classic RPG scenario space, and I'd love to use it some day. (The book also gives it pretty thorough mechanical support.)
The
Discworld RPG presents several other settings in short form, and all of them seem like they could be a good time. For example, there's advice for a Fourecks "road warrior" setting.* I should note that this book is somewhat
old-fashioned in places, but it could be worse when it comes to things like colonialism and female empowerment. The Brown Islands is run by foreign governors... but the indigenous people don't much care what they say. There's a Klatchian setting with a harem... but the women are comfortably running the town. Et cetera.
* I was expecting the waterless
regatta from The Last Continent, given this book's reluctance to extend canon. I suspect road warrior was chosen
just for the cart wars / car wars joke.
Sample scenarios
The book presents three adventure scenarios; two about fruit and one about herring historical justice.
In "Lost and Found", the PCs investigate a banana shortage and discover a magical jungle lab emitting reptilian monsters. In "Full Court Press", the PCs get involved in the succession politics of an apple-growing duchy. In "Sektoberfest in NoThingFjord", the PCs set out to rescue a skald (storyteller) from a huge troll and probably end up settling a historical injustice.
I want to say off the bat that the underlying ideas are great. I'd run a scenario based on the first or third scenario without hesitation. 👍
And the implementation of those ideas is mostly good. 👍
Unfortunately, the presentation of the scenarios is undermined by two major issues.
Issue 1: Failing to help the reader
The authors commit
one of the cardinal sins of RPG scenario design: presenting the adventure as a fun little mystery for the GM to be puzzled by until they've read to the end. None of the important parts are explained up front. The authors want the players to feel like they're experiencing a story? Sure. Writing the scenario as if the GM trying to read the thing also has to experience it as a story? Excruciating.
So in Lost and Found, the GM reading isn't told why there's a banana shortage, which is the entire basis of the scenario. Without a precis sketch up front, they won't find out for many pages. Long after they encounter a text box which says: "remember that the problem lies
hundreds of miles distant, and is somewhat peculiar, with a certain
amount of unconventional magic involved." The reader can't "remember" those three things. They haven't been told any of it!
So the GM who just wants to know if they like this adventure enough to study it and run it has to read the whole thing through to find out, then reread it with the basis facts required to actually plan how to use the scenario. It would have been trivially easy to provide the necessary information in a text box or paragraph at the start.
In Full Court Press, it's worse. The scenario writers simply didn't finish their job. Who killed the old duke, and why? What do the various described activities indicate? Well, it "depends on what the GM has decided about the true history and motivation of the NPCs" (p 394). "Matters should culminate in the revelation of some truth".
This is a cop-out, and one which particularly stings because not only does the text lack a disclaimer up front ("this scenario is incomplete"), it actually claims a GM can use the scenario "as is"!
If the problem was space, why not just write even less of the adventure and put it with the other incomplete scenario ideas at the end of the book?
The "failing to help the reader" issue comes up somewhat in Sektoberfest in NoThingFjord, too. The PCs are in a cave complex chasing after an abducted skald (p 396). They hear a deep voice relating things that happened in the past (something a skald does), and then they see the abductee. Seven paragraphs and a section break later, the reader discovers that it's not the skald who's been talking! I'm fairly sure this was just sloppy editing rather than a deliberate mystery, but again, a paragraph at the start sketching the overall scenario would have avoided the problem.
Issue 2: Implied culture of play
The other issue I'll freely admit is subjective: The scenarios advocate for a culture of play which makes me uncomfortable. It's similar to the problem I had with some of the tempo/pace advice (above).
We're told that the GM should just
veto a PC's advantages from putting points in Wealth (p 386). The GM should fudge dice results and move things behind the scenes and ignore creature traits (p 391) so that things happen as they envisaged. There's
this expectation for the GM to have an idea of "the way things ought to
go" and covertly change things to make that happen. Is it railroading? It's at least railroading-adjacent.
Reading Sektoberfest in NoThingFjord,
I started to believe that the authors just fundamentally disagree with what I would consider the deepest TTRPG loop: mentally simulating a world, seeing what the characters try to do, and then arriving at plausible outcomes
using rules + good judgment + knowledge of how the world works.
- Instead of referring to rules for light, it's "reasonable" to "penalise" explorers for not taking
equipment such as lanterns.
- Instead of referring to rules for navigation, "there's only a limited
amount of fun to be had by getting them lost, and having them completely
lost and starving to death is dull. But the players might pay more
attention if they sense that the GM is thinking about that possibility."*
- Players get to "make IQ rolls to grasp the subtleties of" an issue once the GM has described it, instead of engaging their brains.
- After the script says a troll gestures at the wall, "visitors
should make Per rolls to notice the general shape
of the walls on the far side of the cave." Implicitly, characters can't
notice a secret until the "right" story beat, no matter
what they do.
* There are numerous references throughout the book to the GM feeling "kind" or "sadistic".
Again: The Discworld RPG has very few story-telling-game mechanics, and the ones it has (like Riding The Narrative) are limited and optional. But there are all these little asides telling a GM not to run the game as the crunchy traditional GURPS TTRPG it has been built as.
I understand
that occasionally a GM might end up with the donkey up the minaret, and have to choose between (a) cheating to create a fun
play experience, or (b) letting the chips fall where they may. But note that this is a choice.
If you play it without cheating, yes, you might have an early TPK or an anticlimactic ending or have to split a session because you run out of time. Yes, it might be less fun.* You at least won't be teaching the players lessons like "the PCs can't lose" or "the PCs can't win early with cleverness" or "there will be x amount of conflict per game session no matter what" or "the GM doesn't care about the rules of the game".
* But you don't know for sure.
If the GM finds that they need to cheat to "save" a fun play experience, something brought them to that point. It's almost certainly down to a failure of the system, a failure of the scenario, or a failure
of the GM. Two of those things were within the purview of the authors to fix, and in a book of this size they could have advised on the third. Instead, they keep calling for a thumb on the scale within the scenario design. My personal opinion is that it's a bad look. Rant over; my apologies.
Other scenario possibilities
Fortunately, we don't have to end the review on a sour note! The final part of the chapter ends with a half a dozen scenario seeds, for a GM to take and run with. These are all very ideas-dense and a great fit for the canon, and I enjoyed reading them.
If I were to run the GURPS Discworld RPG, I'd pick one of these to start with – probably Plumbing the depths. If PTerry hadn't suffered his health disaster, I think we were cued up for a book about the Undertaking in Ankh-Morpork, and this offers a chance to explore what that might have been.
Remainder
There's some end matter, too! It consists of a slightly absurd glossary of Disc terms, the inevitable Discworld + GURPS bibliography (which sums up the books fairly pithily), and a comprehensive index which almost never just redirects the reader to another index entry (D&D, take note).
Final thoughts
I began this book as a Discworld fan and GURPS outsider. By the end of it, I had a better grip on GURPS and an itch to go back and read through the Discworld books. I consider that a win!
I'm also backing the new Modiphius game, Terry Pratchett's Discworld RPG: Adventures in Ankh-Morpork. I can't wait to see the difference in approaches to this large (and for many reasons difficult-to-translate) corpus of creative material.